Is 70 20 10 outdated?

Quick Peek:

The 70 20 10 learning and development framework has been criticized for its lack of empirical data, use of absolute numbers, and failure to consider individual learning styles. While not outdated, organizations should tailor learning experiences to meet the needs of different individuals. Despite its popularity, many people and organizations point to problems with the model. It’s essential to be more thoughtful in the approach to learning and development.

Is 70 20 10 Outdated?

Despite its rise in popularity and the fact that many people believe it is still relevant, many people and organizations point to problems with the 70 20 10 model. A big part of the criticism has to do with the lack of empirical supporting data and the use of absolute numbers.

First, let’s recap what the 70 20 10 model is. It is a learning and development framework that suggests individuals learn 70% of what they know through on-the-job experiences, 20% through interactions with others, and 10% through formal training and education.

The Problems with the 70 20 10 Model

One of the main criticisms of the 70 20 10 model is the lack of empirical supporting data. While the model has been widely adopted by many organizations, there is little evidence to support its effectiveness. Critics argue that the model is based on anecdotal evidence and lacks scientific rigor.

Another problem with the 70 20 10 model is the use of absolute numbers. The model suggests that individuals learn 70% of what they know through on-the-job experiences, 20% through interactions with others, and 10% through formal training and education. However, these numbers are not universal and may not apply to all individuals or organizations. Some may learn more effectively through formal training and education, while others may learn more through on-the-job experiences.

READ How to save $1000

Furthermore, the 70 20 10 model does not take into account the individual’s learning style or preferences. Some individuals may prefer hands-on learning, while others may prefer a more structured approach. The model does not provide guidance on how to tailor learning experiences to meet the needs of different individuals.

Is the 70 20 10 Model Outdated?

While the 70 20 10 model has been widely adopted by many organizations, it is not without its flaws. However, this does not necessarily mean that the model is outdated. Rather, it highlights the need for organizations to be more thoughtful in their approach to learning and development.

Organizations should consider a variety of learning and development approaches, including formal training and education, on-the-job experiences, and interactions with others. They should also take into account the individual’s learning style and preferences, and tailor learning experiences accordingly.

In Conclusion

The 70 20 10 model has been a popular learning and development framework for many years. While it has its critics, it is not necessarily outdated. However, organizations should be more thoughtful in their approach to learning and development, taking into account a variety of approaches and tailoring experiences to meet the needs of different individuals.

Ultimately, the goal of any learning and development program should be to help individuals acquire the skills and knowledge they need to be successful in their roles. Whether that is achieved through on-the-job experiences, interactions with others, or formal training and education will depend on the individual and the organization.